Customer Logins

Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.

Customer Logins

My Logins

All Customer Logins
S&P Global
Explore S&P Global
  • S&P Global
  • S&P Dow Jones Indices
  • S&P Global Market Intelligence
  • S&P Global Mobility
  • S&P Global Commodity Insights
  • S&P Global Ratings
  • S&P Global Sustainable1
Close
Discover more about S&P Global’s offerings.
Investor Relations
  • Investor Relations Overview
  • Presentations
  • Investor Fact Book
  • News Releases
  • Quarterly Earnings
  • SEC Filings & Reports
  • Executive Committee
  • Merger Information
  • Governance
  • Stock & Dividends
  • Shareholder Services
  • Contact
English
  • Español
  • 中文网站
  • Português
  • 한국어
  • हिंदी
  • 日本語
Support
  • Get Support
  • System Notifications
  • Delivery Platforms
  • Regulatory Engagement
Login
  • Commodity Insights Login
  • Access IHS Markit Products
Register
logo Commodity Insights
  • Commodities
  • Products & Solutions
  • News & Research
  • Pricing & Benchmarks
  • Events
  • Sustainable1
  • Who We Are
  • S&P Global
  • S&P Dow Jones Indices
  • S&P Global Market Intelligence
  • S&P Global Mobility
  • S&P Global Commodity Insights
  • S&P Global Ratings
  • S&P Global Sustainable1
  • Oil Upstream LNG Natural Gas Electric Power Coal Shipping Chemicals Metals Agriculture
    Latest in Commodities
    Listen: Change Makers: Rodney Clemente, Energy Recovery

    Energy Recovery, with roots in the desalination industry, designs and manufactures energy-efficiency...

    India woos upstream oil and gas investors with changes on revenue sharing, fiscal incentives

    India has unveiled a new set of policies for its oil and gas sector, under which it aims to offer a...

    PACIFIC LNG: Key market indicators for July 14-18

    Platts JKM, the benchmark price reflecting LNG delivered to Northeast Asia, is expected to stay firm...

  • Agriculture & Food Biofuels Chemicals Fertilizers Clean Energy Technology Gas & Power Crude Oil Fuels & Refined Products LNG Steel & Metals Upstream & Midstream (Oil & Gas) Crop Science Carbon & Scenarios Shipping
    Capabilities
    Market Insights and Analytics CI Consulting Commodity Prices and Essential Market Data Real-Time News, Prices and Analysis Forward Curves and Risk Valuation Data
    Data and Distribution
  • Latest News Headlines All Topics Videos Podcasts Special Reports Infographics Insight Blog    Commodity Insights Magazine Commodity Insights LIVE
  • Our Methodology Methodology & Specifications Price Assessments Subscriber Notes Price Symbols Symbol Search & Directories Corrections Complaints
    References
    Market On Close Index Methodology Review & Change MOC Participation Guidelines Holiday Dunl.org SEE ALL REFERENCE TOOLS
  • All Events Webinars Conferences Methodology Education Training and eLearning Forums Conferences Live Global Energy Awards    CERAWeek
    Featured Events
    Webinars Watt's new in the current affairs of Battery Metals
    • 28 Aug 2025
    • Online
    Webinars APPEC 2025
    • 28 Aug 2025
    • Online
    Webinar Madrid Market Briefing
    • 16 Sep 2025
    • Madrid, Spain
  • Overview Contact Us Regulatory Engagement & Market Issues Commodity Insights LIVE
BLOG Nov 19, 2019

BP’s sale of Alaskan assets leaves Alaska LNG in question

Contributor Image
Isaac Nuti

Senior Technical Researcher

On the 27th of August, BP plc (BP) announced the sale of its upstream and midstream oil and gas assets in Alaska. Hilcorp Energy Co (Hilcorp) is the buyer, agreeing to pay US$ 5.6 billion to assume ownership of BP's interests. This large sale is a positive step in BP's planned US$ 10 billion divestment program, aligning with their strategy. The deal, which included working interest in the Prudhoe Bay asset, along with the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS) and several other assets, is expected to have significant implications for the future of Alaskan oil and gas production. According to our analysis, an important portion of BP's future revenue stream in North America was slated to come from gas export to the Alaska LNG project (see chart below). A delay in development plans will inevitably have an unfavorable impact on the Net Present Value (NPV) of the assets. Our analysis indicates that the NPV will contract by approximately US$2 billion under a five year delayed development plan scenario.


Figure 1: Graph showing percentage of gas revenue relative to total revenue from BP's oil and gas field assets in Alaska.

Recent presentations by the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation show that gas production could commence as soon as 2024/2025 from the area. According to IHS Vantage®, using this as a start of gas export, sales gas revenue ramps up to approximately 50% of total revenue from the fields sold to Hilcorp by 2030. However, this analysis was done before BP announced its exit from Alaska. BP operated the Prudhoe Bay asset and held significant interest in the Point Thomson asset, both of which were set to be significant contributors to the Alaska LNG development. Considering the current pressure on gas price, and with IHS Markit's long term gas price forecast set to average around US$4.67/mcf from 2025 to 2035, Hilcorp will have to strategically invest in these assets to ensure a long life for production and stable cash flows.


Figure 2: IHS Vantage project start dates for all assets sold by BP to Hilcorp.

With current modeled start dates, shown in the table above, the sold assets in IHS Vantage® have a combined after-tax net present value (AT NPV) of US$ 14,690 million. This assumes an oil price of US$50/bbl, gas price of US$3.24/mcf and a 10% discount rate and an inflation rate of 2%. The projects highlighted in grey in the above table are future projects that assume gas is delivered to market. When we adjust the start date of these projects, it has significant impact on overall value of the assets. While a five year delay leads to an NPV reduction of approximately US$2 billion, a ten year delay would practically double the dilution in the NPV of these projects.


Figure 3: Effects of delayed production on valuation of sold assets.

The chart above quickly portrays the impact that production and revenue delays have on valuation of assets. The US$5.6 billion deal demonstrates the value in the area, however with an investment of this magnitude, delivery will be crucial. As stated previously, it is yet to be seen if the gas production will be delayed or possibly not go forward, given the change in ownership and other possible complications. Outside forces, such as fluctuating oil and gas prices can also change these results. Regardless of start date, the assets hold significant potential, and Hilcorp will look to maximize this potential through timing of its investments and efficiencies in its operations.

Isaac Nuti is senior research associate for Vantage at IHS Markit.

Posted 19th November 2019



This article was published by S&P Global Commodity Insights and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.

Previous Next
Recommended for you

Energy Solutions
Consulting
Upstream Oil & Gas
Subscribe to the Blog

Receive monthly energy insights from our blog right in your inbox.

Subscribe

CERAWeek 2024

Multidimensional Energy Transition: Markets, climate, technology and geopolitics
March 6 – 10 in Houston, TX

LEARN MORE
Related Posts
VIEW ALL
Blog Sep 07, 2024

Indonesia's block awards drive exploration across mature, emerging, and frontier areas

Blog Sep 06, 2024

Fueling growth: Indonesia's block awards drive exploration across mature, emerging, and frontier areas

Blog Sep 06, 2024

Not in my backyard… or yours: What the new EU Methane Rule means for Kazakh crude oil exports

VIEW ALL
{"items" : [ {"name":"share","enabled":true,"desc":"<strong>Share</strong>","mobdesc":"Share","options":[ {"name":"facebook","url":"https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3a%2f%2fssl.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fbps-sale-of-alaskan-assets-leaves-alaska-lng-in-question.html","enabled":true},{"name":"twitter","url":"https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=http%3a%2f%2fssl.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fbps-sale-of-alaskan-assets-leaves-alaska-lng-in-question.html&text=BP%e2%80%99s+sale+of+Alaskan+assets+leaves+Alaska+LNG+in+question+%7c+S%26P+Global+","enabled":true},{"name":"linkedin","url":"https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=http%3a%2f%2fssl.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fbps-sale-of-alaskan-assets-leaves-alaska-lng-in-question.html","enabled":true},{"name":"email","url":"?subject=BP’s sale of Alaskan assets leaves Alaska LNG in question | S&P Global &body=http%3a%2f%2fssl.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fbps-sale-of-alaskan-assets-leaves-alaska-lng-in-question.html","enabled":true},{"name":"whatsapp","url":"https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=BP%e2%80%99s+sale+of+Alaskan+assets+leaves+Alaska+LNG+in+question+%7c+S%26P+Global+ http%3a%2f%2fssl.ihsmarkit.com%2fcommodityinsights%2fen%2fci%2fresearch-analysis%2fbps-sale-of-alaskan-assets-leaves-alaska-lng-in-question.html","enabled":true}]}, {"name":"rtt","enabled":true,"mobdesc":"Top"} ]}
Filter Sort
  • About S&P Global Commodity Insights
  • Media Center
  • Advertisers
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • History
  • Glossary
  • S&P Global Inc.
  • Our Values
  • Overview
  • Investor Relations
  • Customer Care & Sales
  • Careers
  • Our History
  • News Releases
  • Support by Division
  • Get Support
  • Corporate Responsibility
  • Ventures
  • Quarterly Earnings
  • Report an Ethics Concern
  • Leadership
  • Press
  • SEC Filings & Reports
  • Office Locations
  • IOSCO ESG Rating & Data Product Statements
  • © 2025 by S&P Global Inc. All rights reserved.
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Notice
  • Privacy Policy
  • Client Privacy Portal
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  • Site Map